An Article Critique on Poverty and Culture of Daily Life Essay - 2

An Article Critique on Poverty and Culture of insouciant Life - Essay ExampleThis study declares that two explicit examples of the kitchen-gardening of free-and-easy life were explained from the experiences of jajmani, allegedly a traditional that supports division of labor in India through landowner and tenant relationships and that of sharecropping and tenancy relations noted from the residents of Palanpur, set forth as located in the Moradabad district of Uttar Pradesh. The relationships noted and observed herewith plain manifested ruling and acceding relationships, where, as the author disclosed exemplify continued cooperation and conflict which supports and bring forths their respective needs. Likewise, Kumar differentiated among e actuallyday needs versus non-everyday needs as a crucial factor in explaining the culture of insouciant life. In addition, the author also presented three distinct cases or scenarios where some innovative poor individuals were fit to get out of poverty and have enabled them to successfully improve their social standing and be rivet on other pursuits, instead of being immersed in the culture of daily life. As the paper highlights culture was evidently presented as a crucial and contributory factor to poverty and development the culture of daily life enables people who had been oriented and born into this social and cultural structure continue to support and sustain both cooperative and conflicting scenarios the elements or values of culture of daily life were deemed to be uncongenial and not homogeneous in nature but rather, a more contradictory and diverse conglobation of cultural norms, values, traditions that get to be refined through daily activities and the culture of daily life was described as accommodative and lending in nature to the status quo as such any distinct or separate experience that tends to be unconventional or untraditional does not disrupt its very nature and continue to persist for a long time t hrough the future. Critique the Authors Argument The authors argument was actually logically sound and objective as advantageously as fair and balanced since at the onset, various theoretical and conceptual frameworks on the subject were provided to test an in-depth overview and understanding of the nature of culture and the culture of daily life, as required. The review of related literature competently supported the given arguments and the author also presented other researches and studies that provided counter arguments to those that were previously premised.